Bangs v. Avert
2 How. Pr. 122
This text of 2 How. Pr. 122 (Bangs v. Avert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bangs v. Avert, 2 How. Pr. 122 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).
Opinion
Denied the motion, with costs, without prejudice, on the ground that the plaintiffs did not state particularly what matters were sought to be replied. The affidavit was not full enough.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 How. Pr. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bangs-v-avert-nysupct-1846.