Bango v. Crosby

921 So. 2d 779, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2447, 2006 WL 407070
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 23, 2006
DocketNo. 1D04-5032
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 921 So. 2d 779 (Bango v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bango v. Crosby, 921 So. 2d 779, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2447, 2006 WL 407070 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. As the circuit court entered its order without affording petitioner time to file his reply to the Department’s response, we quash the order of the circuit court. This case is hereby remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. See Forbes v. Crosby, 866 So.2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). In light of this disposition, we decline to address the correctness of the circuit court’s decision at this time.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

ERVIN, WOLF and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramsey v. State
921 So. 2d 779 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
921 So. 2d 779, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2447, 2006 WL 407070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bango-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2006.