Bangle v. . Webb

17 S.E.2d 613, 220 N.C. 423, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 554
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 26, 1941·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Devot, J.

The facts found by the court below are sufficient to support the ruling that the attempted service of process upon defendant Cleve Webb was invalid. Upon these facts the judgment vacating service and dismissing the action as to him must be upheld, as being in accord with the provisions of the statute, which we quote as follows:

“If a person comes into this State in obedience to a summons directing him to attend and testify in this State he shall not, while in this State pursuant to such summons, be subject to arrest or the service of process, civil or criminal, in connection with matters which arose before his entrance into this State under the summons.” Sec. 4, ch. 217, Public Laws 1937; Jíichie’s N. C. Code, sec. 1808 (4).

While there was testimony tending to support a contrary view, an examination of the record discloses that the findings of fact by the court below are supported by competent evidence, and, hence, must be held conclusive and not subject to review. Schoenith, Inc., v. Manufacturing Co., ante, 390; Parris v. Fischer & Co., 219 N. C., 292, 13 S. E. (2d), 540.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bangle v. . Webb, 17 S.E.2d 613, 220 N.C. 423, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 554 (N.C. 1941).

17 S.E.2d 613 (Bangle v. . Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warzynski v. Empire Comfort Systems, Inc.
401 S.E.2d 801 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
Beaty v. International Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers
102 S.E.2d 763 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Thrush v. Thrush
97 S.E.2d 472 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Hare v. . Hare
46 S.E.2d 840 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Cannon v. . Cannon
28 S.E.2d 240 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Tar River Lumber Co.
19 S.E.2d 138 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)