Bangert v. City of Jackson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bangert v. City of Jackson

393 S.W.3d 98, 2012 WL 6018032, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1523

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 4, 2012·No. No. ED 97593·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Bangert, Trustee of the Richard William Bangert Revocable Trust (Appellant), appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Respondent City of Jackson (City) on Appellant’s petition to [99] quiet title to a strip of property claimed by both parties (“disputed property”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).¹ An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Bangert, Trustee of the Richard William Bangert Revocable Trust (Appellant), appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Respondent City of Jackson (City) on Appellant’s petition to [99] quiet title to a strip of property claimed by both parties (“disputed property”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).¹ An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Bangert v. City of Jackson, 393 S.W.3d 98, 2012 WL 6018032, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1523 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

393 S.W.3d 98 (Bangert v. City of Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.