Bang v. McAvoy

30 Misc. 786, 63 N.Y.S. 1104
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 786 (Bang v. McAvoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bang v. McAvoy, 30 Misc. 786, 63 N.Y.S. 1104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division granted, on condition that no other question shall be raised on such appeal, except the question whether the record in the Municipal Court, in an action for the recovery of money only, must show that the defendant resides within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court, and whether the failure of the record to disclose [787]*787such residence is a jurisdictional defect, calling for the reversal of the judgment on appeal, although the defendant did not raise the objection at the trial.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Misc. 786, 63 N.Y.S. 1104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bang-v-mcavoy-nyappterm-1900.