Banfield v. Wiggin

58 N.H. 155
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided August 5, 1877·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Stanley, J.

As a general rule, to which this case forms no exception, the trustee cannot be charged, unless, at the time of the disclosure, the principal defendant had a right of action against him. Greenleaf v. Perrin, 8 N. H. 273; Boardman v. Cushing, 12 N. H. 112; Getchell v. Chase, 37 N. H. 106; Adams v. Barrett, 2 N. H. 374.

Where a trust is created for the benefit of a third person, and the trustee is vested with a discretion as to the time, amount, or manner of the payment to be made, he cannot be charged as trustee. Richards v. R. R., 44 N. H. 127; Wh ite v. Jenkins, 16 Mass. 62; Palmer v. Noyes, 45 N. H. 174.

At the time of the disclosure the trustee held in his hands a fund in trust for the principal defendant, and in the disposition of it he was vested with discretion, not only as to the time and manner, but as to the purposes for which it might be applied.

Exception overruled.

Bingham, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banfield v. Wiggin, 58 N.H. 155 (N.H. 1877).

58 N.H. 155 (Banfield v. Wiggin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. Kennard
86 A. 257 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1913)
Wolfman v. Webster
86 A. 259 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1913)
Corning v. Records
46 A. 462 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1898)
Seward v. Harrington
34 A. 671 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1892)