Banfield v. United States Sugar Corp.
506 So. 2d 461, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1094, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7818
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 1987·No. No. 87-0144·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION
Consistent with recent rulings by the First District Court of Appeal we grant the appellant’s request to certify the following question as an issue of great public importance:
WHETHER A CLAIMANT IN AN UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CASE MAY BE CHARGED A FEE BY THE UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION FOR THE PROVISION OF A TRANSCRIPT OF THE AGENCY HEARING.
See Harris v. Department of Corrections, 486 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Banfield v. United States Sugar Corp., 506 So. 2d 461, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1094, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7818 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
506 So. 2d 461 (Banfield v. United States Sugar Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission v. Gretz
519 So. 2d 1025 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Roberts v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM.
512 So. 2d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)