Banfield v. United States Sugar Corp.
506 So. 2d 461, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1094, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7818
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 22, 1987
DocketNo. 87-0144
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 506 So. 2d 461 (Banfield v. United States Sugar Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Banfield v. United States Sugar Corp., 506 So. 2d 461, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1094, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7818 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
Opinion
ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION
Consistent with recent rulings by the First District Court of Appeal we grant the appellant’s request to certify the following question as an issue of great public importance:
WHETHER A CLAIMANT IN AN UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CASE MAY BE CHARGED A FEE BY THE UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION FOR THE PROVISION OF A TRANSCRIPT OF THE AGENCY HEARING.
See Harris v. Department of Corrections, 486 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission v. Gretz
519 So. 2d 1025 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Roberts v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM.
512 So. 2d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
506 So. 2d 461, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1094, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banfield-v-united-states-sugar-corp-fladistctapp-1987.