Banez v. Banez

876 N.E.2d 1244, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1416
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 27, 2007·No. 2007-1929·Published

Opinion

Stark App. No. 2006CA00216, 2007-Ohio-4584. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It appears from the records of the court that Leticia V. Banez has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of her cross-appeal, due November 19, 2007, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the cross-appeal is dismissed sua sponte. The appeal of Ramon V. Banez remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banez v. Banez, 876 N.E.2d 1244, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1416 (Ohio 2007).

876 N.E.2d 1244 (Banez v. Banez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banez v. Banez, Unpublished Decision (9-4-2007)
2007 Ohio 4584 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)