Banez v. Banez

Ohio Supreme Court

Banez v. Banez

876 N.E.2d 1244, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1416

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 27, 2007

Docket2007-1929

StatusPublished

This text of 876 N.E.2d 1244 (Banez v. Banez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banez v. Banez, 876 N.E.2d 1244, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1416 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Stark App. No. 2006CA00216, 2007-Ohio-4584. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It appears from the records of the court that Leticia V. Banez has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of her cross-appeal, due November 19, 2007, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the cross-appeal is dismissed sua sponte. The appeal of Ramon V. Banez remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stark App. No. 2006CA00216, 2007-Ohio-4584. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It appears from the records of the court that Leticia V. Banez has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of her cross-appeal, due November 19, 2007, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the cross-appeal is dismissed sua sponte. The appeal of Ramon V. Banez remains pending.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

876 N.E.2d 1244, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banez-v-banez-ohio-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack