Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedSeptember 10, 2010

Docket2010-3079

StatusUnpublished

This text of Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the F ederal Circuit JOHN-PIERRE BANEY, Petiti0n,er, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Responden,t, and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Interven0r. 2010-3097 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DA1221090479-W-1. ON MOTION ORDER John-Pierre Baney moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis The Merit Systems Protection Board moves to stay the briefing schedule until Baney pays the docketing fee or is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis

BANEY V. MSPB 2 Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) Baney’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pau- peris is denied. Baney must pay the $450 fee within 14 days of the date of filing of this order or the petition for review will be dismissed (2) The Board’s motion to stay proceedings is granted The briefs of the Board and the Department of Justice are due within 21 days of the date Baney pays the fee. FoR THE CoURT 1 0 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly C1erk John-Pierre Baney Stephanie Conley, Esq. (copy of Baney’s informal brief enclosed) Courtney S. Mcnamara, Esq. s17 CCI a o U.S. 00 ` LS FOR mE2sFi5.i“te.m ser 16 2010 .|AN l~|ORBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the F ederal Circuit JOHN-PIERRE BANEY, Petiti0n,er, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Responden,t, and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Interven0r. 2010-3097 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DA1221090479-W-1. ON MOTION ORDER John-Pierre Baney moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis The Merit Systems Protection Board moves to stay the briefing schedule until Baney pays the docketing fee or is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis

BANEY V. MSPB 2 Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) Baney’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pau- peris is denied. Baney must pay the $450 fee within 14 days of the date of filing of this order or the petition for review will be dismissed (2) The Board’s motion to stay proceedings is granted The briefs of the Board and the Department of Justice are due within 21 days of the date Baney pays the fee. FoR THE CoURT 1 0 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly C1erk John-Pierre Baney Stephanie Conley, Esq. (copy of Baney’s informal brief enclosed) Courtney S. Mcnamara, Esq. s17 CCI a o U.S. 00 ` LS FOR mE2sFi5.i“te.m ser 16 2010 .|AN l~|ORBALY CLERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baney-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2010.