Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 415 F. App'x 244
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 25, 2009·No. 2009-3190·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3190

JOHN-PIERRE BANEY,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in DAl221090177-W-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER The Department of Justice moves to reform the official caption to designate the

Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent. John-Pierre Baney submits a form

requesting waiver of the requirement that he pay the docketing fee.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when

the Board's decision concerns solely the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The

employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of

the underlying case.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion to reform the official caption is granted. The revised official

caption is reflected above.

The requirement that Baney pay the docketing fee is waived. FOR THE COURT

JUN 2 5 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk eaUfkIPPEALS FOR cc: John-Pierre Baney THE F D CIRCUIT

Jane C. Dempsey, Esq. Jeffrey Gauger, Esq. JUN 2 5 2009 s8 JAN HORSMY CLERK

2009-3190 -2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related