Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3190
JOHN-PIERRE BANEY,
Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent.
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in DAl221090177-W-1.
ON MOTION
ORDER The Department of Justice moves to reform the official caption to designate the
Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent. John-Pierre Baney submits a form
requesting waiver of the requirement that he pay the docketing fee.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when
the Board's decision concerns solely the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The
employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of
the underlying case.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion to reform the official caption is granted. The revised official
caption is reflected above.
The requirement that Baney pay the docketing fee is waived. FOR THE COURT
JUN 2 5 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk eaUfkIPPEALS FOR cc: John-Pierre Baney THE F D CIRCUIT
Jane C. Dempsey, Esq. Jeffrey Gauger, Esq. JUN 2 5 2009 s8 JAN HORSMY CLERK
2009-3190 -2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Baney v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.