Baney, J., Aplt. v. Fisher
This text of Baney, J., Aplt. v. Fisher (Baney, J., Aplt. v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
JEREMY BANEY, : No. 43 MAP 2019 : Appellant : : Notice of Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court dated v. : April 3, 2019 at No. 752 MD 2018 : : MIKE FISHER, MICHAEL T. MADEIRA, : KEVIN BARR, CHRISTOPHER : SCHMIDT, AND JOSH SHAPIRO OF : THE PA. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S : OFFICE, RUSS BURCHER OF THE PA. : STATE POLICE, : : Appellees
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2019, the Notice of Appeal is quashed. The
challenged order of the Commonwealth Court is interlocutory and not appealable as of
right. See Pa.R.A.P. 341(b) (definition of a final order); 311 (Interlocutory Appeals as of
Right). Nor does the order constitute a collateral order. See Pa.R.A.P. 313; In re Barnes
Foundation, 871 A.2d 792, 794 (Pa. 2005).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Baney, J., Aplt. v. Fisher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baney-j-aplt-v-fisher-pa-2019.