Banegas v. State

571 So. 2d 126, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9627, 1990 WL 211370
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 1990·No. No. 90-395·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We AFFIRM the lower court. However, as we did in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), we certify to the supreme court the following question:

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

AFFIRMED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banegas v. State, 571 So. 2d 126, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9627, 1990 WL 211370 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

571 So. 2d 126 (Banegas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banegas v. State
586 So. 2d 339 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)