Bane v. Superintendent of Boston State Hospital

216 N.E.2d 111, 350 Mass. 637, 1966 Mass. LEXIS 796
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedApril 28, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 216 N.E.2d 111 (Bane v. Superintendent of Boston State Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bane v. Superintendent of Boston State Hospital, 216 N.E.2d 111, 350 Mass. 637, 1966 Mass. LEXIS 796 (Mass. 1966).

Opinion

Wilkins, C.J.

The prayer in this petition for a writ of mandamus is that the respondent superintendent of the Boston State Hospital be commanded to permit the petitioner to examine, and to obtain copies of, the records of the petitioner’s involuntary “admission and detention” at that hospital in 1963. The petitioner appealed from a denial of the petition.

The Boston State Hospital is under the control of the Department of Mental Health. G. L. c. 19, § 5. Its records are subject to G. L. c. Ill, § 70. The petitioner relies upon § 70, as amended by St. 1945, c. 291. That statute in its present form, however, is as amended through St. 1964, c. 653, which contains an exception expressly excluding from inspection by a patient or his attorney the records of “a *638 hospital or clinic under the control of the department of mental health.”

The petitioner contends that St. 1964, c. 653, was enacted in violation of Senate Bule 50, 1 but the violation is not conceded. In any event, the statute cannot be thus impugned in a court of law. Field v. Clark, 143 U. S. 649, 672. Sears v. Treasurer & Recr. Gen. 327 Mass. 310, 321. Weeks v. Smith, 81 Maine, 538, 547. 81 C. J. S., States, § 39.

There has been no violation of art. 5 of the Declaration of Bights of the Constitution of the Commonwealth.

Order denying petition affirmed.

1

“No motion or proposition of a subject different from that under consideration shall be admitted under the color of an amendment.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwab v. Ariyoshi
564 P.2d 135 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1977)
Gotkin v. Miller
379 F. Supp. 859 (E.D. New York, 1974)
Bednar v. King
272 A.2d 616 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1970)
Bernard Bane v. John R. Spencer
393 F.2d 108 (First Circuit, 1968)
Shikara v. Commissioner of Mental Health
227 N.E.2d 477 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 N.E.2d 111, 350 Mass. 637, 1966 Mass. LEXIS 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bane-v-superintendent-of-boston-state-hospital-mass-1966.