Bane v. Pearson
This text of Bane v. Pearson (Bane v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6769
ROBERT ALLEN BANE, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EDDIE LEE PEARSON, Warden; LIEUTENANT HAMLETTE, Supervisor, Housing Unit 4; H. JOHNSON, Major, Chief of Security; VERNON SMITH, Doctor, Director of Health Services; MS. ELLIS, Medical Supervisor; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; SUSSEX II STATE PRISON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-295-1-AM)
Submitted: October 27, 2004 Decided: November 16, 2004
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Allen Bane, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph McNelis, III, Coreen Antoinette Bromfield, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Philip Carlton Hollowell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Robert Allen Bane appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bane v.
Pearson, No. CA-03-295-1-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 2004). We grant
Bane’s unopposed motion to dismiss Ellis as a party to this appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bane v. Pearson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bane-v-pearson-ca4-2004.