Bandy v. United States

Supreme Court

Bandy v. United States

364 U.S. 477, 81 S. Ct. 244, 7 L. Ed. 2d 850, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 84

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 5, 1960

Docket171, Misc

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 364 U.S. 477 (Bandy v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bandy v. United States, 364 U.S. 477, 81 S. Ct. 244, 7 L. Ed. 2d 850, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 84 (1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. In light of the circumstances pointed out by the Government surrounding the alleged inability of the petitioner to secure the services of his own handwriting expert, the error which occurred in the “Agreed Statement of the Case” and which was repeated by the Government in its brief and the Court of Appeals in its opinion, the failure to subpoena witnesses with respect to petitioner’s alibi, and the dispute which arose with respect to representation of petitioner by his appointed counsel on appeal, the judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for a hearing of the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. In light of the circumstances pointed out by the Government surrounding the alleged inability of the petitioner to secure the services of his own handwriting expert, the error which occurred in the “Agreed Statement of the Case” and which was repeated by the Government in its brief and the Court of Appeals in its opinion, the failure to subpoena witnesses with respect to petitioner’s alibi, and the dispute which arose with respect to representation of petitioner by his appointed counsel on appeal, the judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for a hearing of the appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

364 U.S. 477, 81 S. Ct. 244, 7 L. Ed. 2d 850, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bandy-v-united-states-scotus-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack