Bandmann v. Davis
This text of 59 P. 856 (Bandmann v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
— The subject of this action is a contract, its cause is the breach thereof by defendant, and its object is to recover a judgment for the damages occasioned by such breach. From a judgment for §1,600 in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, the defendant appeals.
The consideration of the many specifications of error has engaged our careful attention. We are satisfied that no error prejudicial to the defendant was committed by the district court, and that substantial justice under well recognized prin[385]*385ciples of law has been meted out by the judgment. To discuss and determine seriatim the points made by the defendant would serve no useful purpose, and we therefore refrain from encumbering the records and reports with comparatively useless matter. We may observe, however, that the contract upon which the action is based is not a lease.
The judgment and the order refusing a new trial are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 P. 856, 23 Mont. 382, 1899 Mont. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bandmann-v-davis-mont-1899.