Banderas v. Banco Central del Ecuador

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Banderas v. Banco Central del Ecuador

463 So. 2d 523, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12356

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 1985·No. Nos. 84-600, 84-677·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the contempt orders entered by the trial court. We hold that appellants received adequate notice of the provisions contained in the Final Judgment prohibiting the transfer, sale, or disposal of any assets; that there was no fatal defect in the institution of process, rule 3.840, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, [see Aiello v. State, 338 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) ]; and that substantial competent evidence supports the judgments of conviction for indirect criminal contempt and for indirect civil contempt. In addition, we affirm the conviction for direct criminal contempt based upon J. Fernando Banderas’s failure to appear at a hearing.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the contempt orders entered by the trial court. We hold that appellants received adequate notice of the provisions contained in the Final Judgment prohibiting the transfer, sale, or disposal of any assets; that there was no fatal defect in the institution of process, rule 3.840, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, [see Aiello v. State, 338 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) ]; and that substantial competent evidence supports the judgments of conviction for indirect criminal contempt and for indirect civil contempt. In addition, we affirm the conviction for direct criminal contempt based upon J. Fernando Banderas’s failure to appear at a hearing.

Affirmed.

Banderas v. Banco Central del Ecuador, 463 So. 2d 523, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12356 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

463 So. 2d 523 (Banderas v. Banco Central del Ecuador) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related