Banderas v. Banco Central del Ecuador

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Banderas v. Banco Central del Ecuador

463 So. 2d 523, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12356

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 1985

DocketNos. 84-600, 84-677

StatusPublished

This text of 463 So. 2d 523 (Banderas v. Banco Central del Ecuador) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banderas v. Banco Central del Ecuador, 463 So. 2d 523, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12356 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the contempt orders entered by the trial court. We hold that appellants received adequate notice of the provisions contained in the Final Judgment prohibiting the transfer, sale, or disposal of any assets; that there was no fatal defect in the institution of process, rule 3.840, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, [see Aiello v. State, 338 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) ]; and that substantial competent evidence supports the judgments of conviction for indirect criminal contempt and for indirect civil contempt. In addition, we affirm the conviction for direct criminal contempt based upon J. Fernando Banderas’s failure to appear at a hearing.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the contempt orders entered by the trial court. We hold that appellants received adequate notice of the provisions contained in the Final Judgment prohibiting the transfer, sale, or disposal of any assets; that there was no fatal defect in the institution of process, rule 3.840, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, [see Aiello v. State, 338 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) ]; and that substantial competent evidence supports the judgments of conviction for indirect criminal contempt and for indirect civil contempt. In addition, we affirm the conviction for direct criminal contempt based upon J. Fernando Banderas’s failure to appear at a hearing.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

463 So. 2d 523, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banderas-v-banco-central-del-ecuador-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack