Bandemer v. Calvin Ritter Protestant Beneficial Society

158 A.D. 951

This text of 158 A.D. 951 (Bandemer v. Calvin Ritter Protestant Beneficial Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bandemer v. Calvin Ritter Protestant Beneficial Society, 158 A.D. 951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. A1I concurred. Emma L. Barton and Others, AppeEants, v. Jennie B. Reynolds and Frank A. Crofoot, as Administrators, etc., and Jennie B. Reynolds, Individually, Respondents.— Interlocutory judgment modified by striking out the words “on the merits,” andas so modified affirmed, with costs, with leave to the plaintiff to amend within twenty days upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal. All concurred, except Foote and MerreE, JJ., who dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D. 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bandemer-v-calvin-ritter-protestant-beneficial-society-nyappdiv-1913.