Bandell v. Jelleff

78 N.W. 565, 102 Wis. 480, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 50
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 14, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 78 N.W. 565 (Bandell v. Jelleff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bandell v. Jelleff, 78 N.W. 565, 102 Wis. 480, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 50 (Wis. 1899).

Opinion

Dodge, J.

An examination of-the evidence discloses no preponderance against the findings of fact, by which, among other things, it is found that the defendants took title with notice of facts and circumstances sufficient to put them upon inquiry, which would have led them to discover the fraud of their grantor in obtaining title from the plaintiff. This is not, as contended by appellants, a conclusion of law, but an inference of fact from various items of evidence. Its effect is to deny the appellants the protection equity might accord to an innocent purchaser for value, and they are not entitled to reimbursement of the small amount of money paid by them to their grantor, no part of which came to the hands of the plaintiff. Rindskopf v. Myers, 87 Wis. 80.

By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rindskopf v. Myers
57 N.W. 967 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 N.W. 565, 102 Wis. 480, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bandell-v-jelleff-wis-1899.