Bandel v. . the City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Bandel v. . the City of New York

98 N.E. 1097, 204 N.Y. 683, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 935

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 8, 1912

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 98 N.E. 1097 (Bandel v. . the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bandel v. . the City of New York, 98 N.E. 1097, 204 N.Y. 683, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 935 (N.Y. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Culler, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner and Collin, JJ.; Hiscock, J., concurs on the ground that plaintiff having been licensed to practice osteopathy under the provisions of section 14 of chapter 344 of the Laws of 1907, and not in accordance with the last clause of subdivision 6 of section 7 of said act and related pro *684 visions, is not in position to claim that the ordinance in question is arbitrarily and unreasonably discriminating. Concurs: Vann, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Culler, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner and Collin, JJ.; Hiscock, J., concurs on the ground that plaintiff having been licensed to practice osteopathy under the provisions of section 14 of chapter 344 of the Laws of 1907, and not in accordance with the last clause of subdivision 6 of section 7 of said act and related pro *684 visions, is not in position to claim that the ordinance in question is arbitrarily and unreasonably discriminating. Concurs: Vann, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 N.E. 1097, 204 N.Y. 683, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bandel-v-the-city-of-new-york-ny-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack