Bandel v. City of New York

69 Misc. 93, 124 N.Y.S. 869
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 Misc. 93 (Bandel v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bandel v. City of New York, 69 Misc. 93, 124 N.Y.S. 869 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1910).

Opinions

Putnam, J.

The right of the osteopaths to be registered as physicians in the health department of the city of New York has been sustained. Matter of Bandel v. Dept. of Health, 193 N. Y. 133. The court also declared them qualified to give certificates as to the cause of death, but the opinion (Vann, J.) also stated: “While, doubtless, the department of health can make stringent regulations as to the persons whose certificates of death it will accept for the [94]*94purpose of a burial permit, it is sufficient to say that, so far as appears, when this proceeding was commenced it had not made any regulation which excluded licensed osteopaths from the right to give such certificates.” p. 140.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bandel v. City of New York
144 A.D. 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 Misc. 93, 124 N.Y.S. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bandel-v-city-of-new-york-nysupct-1910.