Bandai America, Inc. v. Summa Management Corp.

413 So. 2d 221, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 7125
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 7, 1982
DocketNo. 12433
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 413 So. 2d 221 (Bandai America, Inc. v. Summa Management Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bandai America, Inc. v. Summa Management Corp., 413 So. 2d 221, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 7125 (La. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

CHEHARDY, Judge.

Defendant, Summa Management Corporation, appeals a district court decision in favor of plaintiff, Bandai America, Inc., for past-due monies for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant.

The record reflects the plaintiff first requested service of process on the defendant through its registered agent for service of process at 3303 Severn Avenue in Metairie, Louisiana. When the return of the sheriff showed it was not served because the agent was unknown at that address, another service was attempted on that agent at 3400 16th Street in Metairie. Service was then ultimately made on a Summa Management Corporation employee.

No appearance was made by the defendant, and consequently a default judgment was taken by the plaintiff.

LSA-C.C.P. art. 1261 states that if there is no registered agent for a corporation due to death, resignation or removal, service of citation may be made at any place where the business of the corporation is regularly conducted by personal service on any employee of suitable age or discretion.

In Colonial Buick, Inc. v. Crescent Chemical Sales, Inc., 240 So.2d 567 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1970), this court reiterated that service of process must be attempted on the designated agent prior to service on one of the defendant’s employees. In the present case, because the record reflects such an attempt was made by the plaintiff, the later service on defendant’s employee was effective.

For the reasons assigned, the trial court judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott Fence Industries, Inc. v. Neuenhaus
490 So. 2d 1132 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
413 So. 2d 221, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 7125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bandai-america-inc-v-summa-management-corp-lactapp-1982.