Banda v. State

444 P.3d 457
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided July 12, 2019·No. No. 78752·Published

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on May 6, 2019. The notice of appeal fails to identify any decisions of the district court. See NRAP 3(c)(1)(B). To the extent that appellant appeals from the order denying a "motion for an order to grant evidentiary hearing," no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from such an order. Castillo v. State , 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). To the extent that appellant appeals from the order denying a motion to modify sentence entered on January 14, 2019, the notice of appeal was untimely filed. Lozada v. State , 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1

Given this order, this court takes no action on the pro se document filed on May 22, 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banda v. State, 444 P.3d 457 (Neb. 2019).

444 P.3d 457 (Banda v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lozada v. State
871 P.2d 944 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1994)
Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)