Bancroft v. Board of Regents of University

Michigan Supreme Court

Bancroft v. Board of Regents of University

158 N.W. 337, 192 Mich. 168, 1916 Mich. LEXIS 753

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 23, 1916

DocketDocket No. 4

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 158 N.W. 337 (Bancroft v. Board of Regents of University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bancroft v. Board of Regents of University, 158 N.W. 337, 192 Mich. 168, 1916 Mich. LEXIS 753 (Mich. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff filed her suit to recover damages for personal injuries which she claims to have incurred and which she avers were occasioned by the negligence of defendants. The defendants demurred to the declaration, and after argument the same was sustained. This was followed by the issuance of a writ of error from this court without any final judgment having been entered in the trial court, and, so far as the record shows, we are not advised that a final judgment has since been entered therein. Under this state of facts the practice will not permit of a review of the case in this court. Green v. Eaton Probate Judge, 40 Mich. 244; Delaney v. Lumber Co., 144 Mich. 351 (108 N. W. 77); Barribeau v. City of Detroit, 146 Mich. 392 (109 N. W. 665); In re Vetter’s Estate, 162 Mich. 109 (127 N. W. 306).

The writ will be dismissed, with costs to appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff filed her suit to recover damages for personal injuries which she claims to have incurred and which she avers were occasioned by the negligence of defendants. The defendants demurred to the declaration, and after argument the same was sustained. This was followed by the issuance of a writ of error from this court without any final judgment having been entered in the trial court, and, so far as the record shows, we are not advised that a final judgment has since been entered therein. Under this state of facts the practice will not permit of a review of the case in this court. Green v. Eaton Probate Judge, 40 Mich. 244; Delaney v. Lumber Co., 144 Mich. 351 (108 N. W. 77); Barribeau v. City of Detroit, 146 Mich. 392 (109 N. W. 665); In re Vetter’s Estate, 162 Mich. 109 (127 N. W. 306).

The writ will be dismissed, with costs to appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 N.W. 337, 192 Mich. 168, 1916 Mich. LEXIS 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bancroft-v-board-of-regents-of-university-mich-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack