Bancroft Training School v. Borough of Haddonfield

82 A. 20, 82 N.J.L. 192, 53 Vroom 192, 1911 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 7
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 18, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 82 A. 20 (Bancroft Training School v. Borough of Haddonfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bancroft Training School v. Borough of Haddonfield, 82 A. 20, 82 N.J.L. 192, 53 Vroom 192, 1911 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 7 (N.J. 1911).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

Upon the merits this assessment should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum filed by the board of equalization of taxes which correctly construes the Tax act of 1903 and applies it to the facts and also points out the significant changes in the Tax act since the case of Bancroft v. Magill, 40 Vroom 589, was decided.

Upon a matter of procedure, however, the writ will have to be dismissed unless the record is perfected by bringing up the judgment of the board of equalization affirming the assessment upon an appeal to it. Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Rahway, 46 Vroom 416.

Under the practice laid down by this case the writ will be dismissed unless within ten days the judgment of the state board is brought up and made a part of the return; in which case the defendant may at once move for tire affirmance of said judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

AHS Hospital Corp. v. Town of Morristown
28 N.J. Tax 456 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A. 20, 82 N.J.L. 192, 53 Vroom 192, 1911 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bancroft-training-school-v-borough-of-haddonfield-nj-1911.