Bancorp Services, L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. Of Canada (u.s.)

Federal Circuit

Bancorp Services, L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. Of Canada (u.s.)

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bancorp Services, L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. Of Canada (u.s.). Read the opinion of the Court — 687 F.3d 1266 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 23, 2011·No. 2011-1467·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit BANCORP SERVICES, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, ~ V. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA (U.S.), Defendant~Appellee, AND ANALECT LLC, Defendcmt. lo 2011-1467 Appea1 from the United StateS DiStrict Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in case no. 00-CV-1073, Judge Car0l E. Jackson. ON MOTION ORDER The parties jointly move for an extension of time, un- til Oct0ber 28, 2011, for Banoorp ServiceS, LLC, to file its

BANCORP SERVICES V. SUN LIFE 2 opening brief and for an extension of tin1e, until February 6, 2012, for Sun Life to file its response brief. Upon consideration thereof IT fS ORDERED THATZ The motion is granted FoR THE C0URT SEP 2 3 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horba1y Clerk cc: Char1es K. Verhoeven, Esq. M tth B. L ' , E . f Fl 3 eW °W"e sq s.s.coum o’FErpPmLs FoR 32 1 ms FsnsnAL macon SEP 23 2011 .|AN HORBALY ~ CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit BANCORP SERVICES, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, ~ V. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA (U.S.), Defendant~Appellee, AND ANALECT LLC, Defendcmt. lo 2011-1467 Appea1 from the United StateS DiStrict Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in case no. 00-CV-1073, Judge Car0l E. Jackson. ON MOTION ORDER The parties jointly move for an extension of time, un- til Oct0ber 28, 2011, for Banoorp ServiceS, LLC, to file its

BANCORP SERVICES V. SUN LIFE 2 opening brief and for an extension of tin1e, until February 6, 2012, for Sun Life to file its response brief. Upon consideration thereof IT fS ORDERED THATZ The motion is granted FoR THE C0URT SEP 2 3 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horba1y Clerk cc: Char1es K. Verhoeven, Esq. M tth B. L ' , E . f Fl 3 eW °W"e sq s.s.coum o’FErpPmLs FoR 32 1 ms FsnsnAL macon SEP 23 2011 .|AN HORBALY ~ CLERK

Bancorp Services, L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. Of Canada (u.s.), (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Bancorp Services, L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. Of Canada (u.s.) (Bancorp Services, L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. Of Canada (u.s.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.