Banco Industrial de Venezuela, C.A., Miami Agency v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of the Florida Keys

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Banco Industrial de Venezuela, C.A., Miami Agency v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of the Florida Keys

522 So. 2d 539, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 802, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1255, 1988 WL 26275

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 29, 1988

DocketNo. 87-1618

StatusPublished

This text of 522 So. 2d 539 (Banco Industrial de Venezuela, C.A., Miami Agency v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of the Florida Keys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banco Industrial de Venezuela, C.A., Miami Agency v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of the Florida Keys, 522 So. 2d 539, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 802, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1255, 1988 WL 26275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Banco Industrial de Venezuela appeals from a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of First Federal Savings & Loan Association of the Florida Keys. Notwithstanding the merits of Banco Industrial’s argument that the trial court erred by admitting parol evidence regarding the parties’ intent in entering into the subordination agreements, we affirm the final judgment. The controversy at trial centered on specific provisions of the mortgage and subordination agreements. We are convinced, having reviewed all the relevant documentation, that the trial court correctly concluded that the First Federal mortgage was superior.

The order appealed from is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Banco Industrial de Venezuela appeals from a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of First Federal Savings & Loan Association of the Florida Keys. Notwithstanding the merits of Banco Industrial’s argument that the trial court erred by admitting parol evidence regarding the parties’ intent in entering into the subordination agreements, we affirm the final judgment. The controversy at trial centered on specific provisions of the mortgage and subordination agreements. We are convinced, having reviewed all the relevant documentation, that the trial court correctly concluded that the First Federal mortgage was superior.

The order appealed from is accordingly affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

522 So. 2d 539, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 802, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1255, 1988 WL 26275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banco-industrial-de-venezuela-ca-miami-agency-v-first-federal-savings-fladistctapp-1988.