Banco De Comercio, S.A.C.A. v. Sun Banks, Inc.
This text of 488 So. 2d 870 (Banco De Comercio, S.A.C.A. v. Sun Banks, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order disqualifying petitioners’ counsel is a clear departure from the essential requirements of the law as enunciated in, inter alia, Williams v. Wood, 475 So.2d 289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Cazares v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc., 429 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), pet. for review denied, 438 So.2d 831 (Fla.1983); and Perez v. State, 474 So.2d 398 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and is therefore quashed on the authority of those decisions.
Certiorari granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 So. 2d 870, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1126, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banco-de-comercio-saca-v-sun-banks-inc-fladistctapp-1986.