Bancker v. Hitchcock

Saratoga Chancery Court

Bancker v. Hitchcock

1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 88

DecidedJanuary 22, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 88 (Bancker v. Hitchcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Saratoga Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bancker v. Hitchcock, 1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 88 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

In this case the chancellor decided that to entitle the complainant in a foreclosure suit to a receiver of the mortgaged premises, he must not only show that the party who is personally liable to him for the payment of the mortgage debt is irresponsible, but he must also show that the mortgaged premises, upon a sale thereof, will not probably produce sufficient to pay the debt and costs. * Application for receiver denied, with costs to be taxed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this case the chancellor decided that to entitle the complainant in a foreclosure suit to a receiver of the mortgaged premises, he must not only show that the party who is personally liable to him for the payment of the mortgage debt is irresponsible, but he must also show that the mortgaged premises, upon a sale thereof, will not probably produce sufficient to pay the debt and costs. * Application for receiver denied, with costs to be taxed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bancker-v-hitchcock-nychanctsara-1842.