Bamonte v. Ocean Beach-Fire Island Co.

222 A.D. 676
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1927·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The parties having stipulated in writing that this case may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff, with costs. We are constrained to hold that the publication of the notices of sale for the taxes levied in 1918 and 1919 was not incompliance with the statute applicable, and that, for such reason, the two deeds made by the county treasurer of Suffolk county to the defendant Ocean Beach-Fire Island Company, dated December 1, 1923, and January 31, 1924, are void and of no effect. (Smith v. Butler, 215 App. Div. 361.) Findings of fact and conclusions of law contrary to this decision are reversed and new findings in accordance therewith will be made. Manning, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bamonte v. Ocean Beach-Fire Island Co., 222 A.D. 676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

222 A.D. 676 (Bamonte v. Ocean Beach-Fire Island Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. Colvin
54 Misc. 2d 927 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)
Rochester Savings Bank v. Stoeltzen & Tapper, Inc.
176 Misc. 147 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)
Peterson v. Weber County
103 P.2d 652 (Utah Supreme Court, 1940)
Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. Stevens
97 P.2d 744 (Utah Supreme Court, 1940)
Olds v. City of Jamestown
20 N.E.2d 756 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)
Lindlots Realty Corp. v. County of Suffolk
251 A.D. 340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)