Bamonte v. Ocean Beach-Fire Island Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bamonte v. Ocean Beach-Fire Island Co.

222 A.D. 676

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1927

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 222 A.D. 676 (Bamonte v. Ocean Beach-Fire Island Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bamonte v. Ocean Beach-Fire Island Co., 222 A.D. 676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

The parties having stipulated in writing that this case may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff, with costs. We are constrained to hold that the publication of the notices of sale for the taxes levied in 1918 and 1919 was not incompliance with the statute applicable, and that, for such reason, the two deeds made by the county treasurer of Suffolk county to the defendant Ocean Beach-Fire Island Company, dated December 1, 1923, and January 31, 1924, are void and of no effect. (Smith v. Butler, 215 App. Div. 361.) Findings of fact and conclusions of law contrary to this decision are reversed and new findings in accordance therewith will be made. Manning, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties having stipulated in writing that this case may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff, with costs. We are constrained to hold that the publication of the notices of sale for the taxes levied in 1918 and 1919 was not incompliance with the statute applicable, and that, for such reason, the two deeds made by the county treasurer of Suffolk county to the defendant Ocean Beach-Fire Island Company, dated December 1, 1923, and January 31, 1924, are void and of no effect. (Smith v. Butler, 215 App. Div. 361.) Findings of fact and conclusions of law contrary to this decision are reversed and new findings in accordance therewith will be made. Manning, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D. 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bamonte-v-ocean-beach-fire-island-co-nyappdiv-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack