Bammon v. Holeproof Hosiery Co.

233 A.D. 699
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 233 A.D. 699 (Bammon v. Holeproof Hosiery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bammon v. Holeproof Hosiery Co., 233 A.D. 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order denying defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to serve an amended complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs; the amended complaint to be served within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The complaint sets out two kinds of causes of action. It assumes to set out a cause of action in equity to reform several instruments claimed to embody a single transaction, so as to make it conform to the alleged actual agreement of the parties, which instruments are alleged to have taken on an erroneous form as a consequence of mutual mistake of the parties or mistake of one and fraud of the other. This cause of action may properly be required to be segregated from the one or more further causes of action alleged, which causes of action are legal in their nature and arose as a consequence of the alleged breach of such agreement as reformed, and which causes of action may properly be made the subject of a jury trial if either party seasonably seeks it. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kitty Kelly Stores, Inc. v. Edison New York Stores, Inc.
243 A.D. 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 A.D. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bammon-v-holeproof-hosiery-co-nyappdiv-1931.