Bamman v. Erickson
262 A.D. 548, 30 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5422
Opinions
Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Taylor,. J., in opinion, dissents and votes to reverse the judgment, to direct, judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for the. amount of plaintiff’s damages to be ascertained upon a new trial,, and for such new trial of the action for that limited purpose;; Close, J., in memorandum, concurs with Taylor, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bamman v. Erickson, 262 A.D. 548, 30 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
262 A.D. 548 (Bamman v. Erickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. . Stedeker
67 N.E. 132 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
Colonial City Traction Co. v. Kingston City Railroad
48 N.E. 900 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
Sciolaro v. . Asch
91 N.E. 263 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)
Martin v. Herzog
126 N.E. 814 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Brady v. . Nally
45 N.E. 547 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Riggs v. . Palmer
22 N.E. 188 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Murray v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
118 A.D. 35 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Fetterman v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.
254 A.D. 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)