Bamforth v. Raddin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Bamforth v. Raddin

96 Mass. 66

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1867

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 Mass. 66 (Bamforth v. Raddin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bamforth v. Raddin, 96 Mass. 66 (Mass. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Foster, J.

The condition of the bond declared upon has not been broken. While the petition for review is pending, and the court has allowed a second order of notice to issue upon it, the obligors have not failed to prosecute it to final judgment. To do so “ forthwith ” is a stipulation satisfied by doing so within such time as the court having jurisdiction of the petition may order. Exceptions overruled

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster, J.

The condition of the bond declared upon has not been broken. While the petition for review is pending, and the court has allowed a second order of notice to issue upon it, the obligors have not failed to prosecute it to final judgment. To do so “ forthwith ” is a stipulation satisfied by doing so within such time as the court having jurisdiction of the petition may order. Exceptions overruled

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 Mass. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bamforth-v-raddin-mass-1867.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack