Bame v. Rutherford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bame v. Rutherford

256 A.D. 883, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5230

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bame v. Rutherford. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D. 228 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 25, 1939·Published

Opinion

The previous decision [255 App. Div. 228; Id. 919] and the order entered thereon are amended to read as follows: “ The order of the Columbia County Court is modified so as to eliminate therefrom any adjudication of equitable defenses or title, and without prejudice to any rights the appellant may have to recover moneys paid to purchase the premises at tax sales or rights which may be enforced only in an action at law or a suit in equity, and as so modified is affirmed with costs.” Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The previous decision [255 App. Div. 228; Id. 919] and the order entered thereon are amended to read as follows: “ The order of the Columbia County Court is modified so as to eliminate therefrom any adjudication of equitable defenses or title, and without prejudice to any rights the appellant may have to recover moneys paid to purchase the premises at tax sales or rights which may be enforced only in an action at law or a suit in equity, and as so modified is affirmed with costs.” Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Bame v. Rutherford, 256 A.D. 883, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

256 A.D. 883 (Bame v. Rutherford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related