Bamboschek v. Bamboschek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bamboschek v. Bamboschek

241 A.D. 530, 271 N.Y.S. 1097, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8297

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 21, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order should be affirmed to the extent "that it denies the motion to punish the defendant for contempt. In all other respects it should be reversed.

The defendant is directed to pay one-third of his earnings from all sources to plaintiff each week from the date of this decision. If he fails so to do, the motion to punish him for contempt may be renewed. The defendant must submit to the attorney for plaintiff every two months a sworn statement of his earnings.

Present-—Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Order affirmed to the extent indicated in opinion and in all ether respects reversed. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order should be affirmed to the extent "that it denies the motion to punish the defendant for contempt. In all other respects it should be reversed.

The defendant is directed to pay one-third of his earnings from all sources to plaintiff each week from the date of this decision. If he fails so to do, the motion to punish him for contempt may be renewed. The defendant must submit to the attorney for plaintiff every two months a sworn statement of his earnings.

Present-—Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Order affirmed to the extent indicated in opinion and in all ether respects reversed. Settle order on notice.

Bamboschek v. Bamboschek, 241 A.D. 530, 271 N.Y.S. 1097, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 530 (Bamboschek v. Bamboschek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related