Bamberger v. Manhattan Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bamberger v. Manhattan Railway Co.

38 N.Y.S. 1141, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 865

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 38 N.Y.S. 1141 (Bamberger v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bamberger v. Manhattan Railway Co., 38 N.Y.S. 1141, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are not in all respects the same as they were in the Otten Case, lately decided by this court (37 N. Y. Supp. 982); but the principle upon which the reversal in the latter case proceeded is applicable to these facts. The variations are not sufficiently important to affect the result. The judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are not in all respects the same as they were in the Otten Case, lately decided by this court (37 N. Y. Supp. 982); but the principle upon which the reversal in the latter case proceeded is applicable to these facts. The variations are not sufficiently important to affect the result. The judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 N.Y.S. 1141, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bamberger-v-manhattan-railway-co-nyappdiv-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack