Bamberger-Stern Co. v. Paris

159 N.Y.S. 647
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 14, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 N.Y.S. 647 (Bamberger-Stern Co. v. Paris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bamberger-Stern Co. v. Paris, 159 N.Y.S. 647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

PHILBIN, J.

The order vacating the order for the debtor’s examination was made by a judge who had not made the original order and was based upon the papers upon which the latter was granted. The vacating of the order was without authority, as it could only have been vacated under the existing conditions by the judge who made it. Code Civ. Proc. § 2433.

Order vacating the order for the examination of the judgment debtor reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the proceedings remitted to the court below for the purpose of fixing a date for the examination. Order denying motion for resettlement of the vacating order reversed. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwartzberg v. Weisblatt
133 Misc. 476 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 N.Y.S. 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bamberger-stern-co-v-paris-nyappterm-1916.