Bamber v. State
This text of 995 So. 2d 624 (Bamber v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jackie BAMBER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
STRINGER, Judge.
Jackie Bamber seeks review of the postconviction court's order summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence, which was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for reconsideration of Bamber's motion for rehearing because the court erroneously determined that it was unauthorized. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(1)(B) (authorizing motion for rehearing for orders denying relief under rule 3.800(a)). Because we are reversing for reconsideration of Bamber's motion for rehearing, we do not reach the merits of the underlying order denying Bamber's rule 3.800(a) motion.
Reversed and remanded.
FULMER and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
995 So. 2d 624, 2008 WL 5192059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bamber-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.