Balz v. Shaw
11 Misc. 444
Opinion
The orde.r appealed from having, been made by the trial judge,' we think we must, in view of the facts, accept his certification as conclusive■ thereon. Todo [445] otherwise would be to substitute our opinion for his knowledge. There was a dispute as to what occurred, and the -trial judge determined it. Green v. Shute, 7 N. Y. Supp. 69; Dearing v. Pearson, 6 Misc. Rep. 616; 26 N. Y. Supp. 74 ; 8 Misc. Rep. 270 ; 28 N. Y. Supp. 715.
For these reasons the order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.
Newburger, J., concurs.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Balz v. Shaw, 11 Misc. 444 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
11 Misc. 444 (Balz v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dearing v. Pearson
28 N.Y.S. 715 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
Dearing v. Pearson
6 Misc. 616 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1893)
Green v. Shute
7 N.Y.S. 69 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1889)