Balz v. Shaw

32 N.Y.S. 220, 11 Misc. 444
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.Y.S. 220 (Balz v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Balz v. Shaw, 32 N.Y.S. 220, 11 Misc. 444 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

EHRLICH, C. J.

The order appealed from having been made by

trial judge, we think we must, in view of the facts, accept his certification as conclusive thereon. To do otherwise would be to substitute our opinion for his knowledge. There was a dispute as to what occurred, and the trial judge determined it. Green v. Shute (City Ct. N. Y.) 7 N. Y. Supp. 69; Dearing v. Pearson (City Ct. N. Y.) 26 N. Y. Supp. 74, affirmed (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 28 N. Y. Supp. 715. For these reasons the order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dearing v. Pearson
28 N.Y.S. 715 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 N.Y.S. 220, 11 Misc. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balz-v-shaw-nynyccityct-1895.