Baluma, S.A. v. Poff

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: March 7, 2022
• Docket: 2:20-cv-01642
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Baluma S.A. d/b/a Enjoy Punta Del Este Case No. 2:20-cv-01642-JCM-DJA 6 & Casino,

7 Plaintiff, Order

8 v.

9 Brian Poff II,

10 Defendant.

11 12 Before the Court is Defendant Brian Poff’s motion to extend time to retain new counsel 13 (ECF No. 25) and his response to the Court’s order to show cause (ECF No. 24). The Court 14 previously ordered Defendant to show cause why he had not complied with the Court’s previous 15 order requiring him to inform the Court whether he would retain new counsel or proceed pro se. 16 (ECF No. 23). The Court gave Defendant until February 17, 2022 to respond. (Id.). Defendant 17 timely responded that he is in the process of retaining counsel and that, in the meantime, he was 18 unaware of how to proceed. (ECF No. 25). He requested a brief extension to retain counsel. 19 (Id.). 20 Under Local Rule 26-3, a motion to extend a date set by an order must, in addition to 21 satisfying the requirements of Local Rule IA 6-1, be supported by a showing of good cause for 22 the extension. LR 26-3. However, courts liberally construe pro se filings. See Hebbe v. Pliler, 23 627 F.3d 338, 342 & n.7 (9th Cir. 2010) (finding that liberal construction of pro se pleadings is 24 required after Twombly and Iqbal). Additionally, under Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure of an 25 opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion constitutes a consent to the 26 granting of the motion. LR 7-2(d). 27 The Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for extension. Plaintiff’s continued efforts to retain 1 extension. While he did not follow the exact requirements of the Local Rules, the Court liberally 2 construes Defendant’s motion. Additionally, Plaintiff did not file a response, constituting its 3 consent to the granting of the motion. 4 5 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for an extension (ECF No. 25) 6 is granted. Plaintiff shall have until Wednesday, April 6, 2022 to inform the Court whether he 7 will retain new counsel or proceed pro se. 8 9 DATED: March 7, 2022 10 DANIEL J. ALBREGTS 11 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27