Baltman v. Palm Oil & Supply Co.

88 So. 30, 17 Ala. App. 647, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 253
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 1920·No. 1 Div. 387.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

In order to support an appeal under section 2837 of Code 1907, there *648 must be a final judgment. An order staying proceedings is interlocutory and will not support an appeal, and a special finding of fact as provided by, Code 1907, § 5360,’ is not'a judgment, but takes tbe place of tbe verdict of a jury. We find no final judgment in the record that will- support an appeal, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed.

We will say, however, with regard to the merits of the ease, that the decisions in Archer v. Bank, 88 Ala. 249, 7 South. 53, and Steiner v. Bank, 115 Ala. 575, 22 South. 72, are determinative of plaintiff’s rights.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baltman v. Palm Oil & Supply Co., 88 So. 30, 17 Ala. App. 647, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 253 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

88 So. 30 (Baltman v. Palm Oil & Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Archer v. People's Savings Bank
88 Ala. 249 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1889)
Steiner Bros. v. Bank of Montgomery
115 Ala. 575 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1896)