Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Huddleston
98 N.E. 382, 50 Ind. App. 698, 1912 Ind. App. LEXIS 78
Opinion
— In this case, the pleadings, the evidence and the assignment of errors are the same, and the instructions given and [699] refused are substantially the same, as this court considered in the ease of Baltimore, etc., R. Co. v. Reed (1912), ante, 220, 98 N. E. 141.
On the authority of that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Huddleston, 98 N.E. 382, 50 Ind. App. 698, 1912 Ind. App. LEXIS 78 (Ind. Ct. App. 1912).
98 N.E. 382 (Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Huddleston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Trustees of Tunnelton Lodge No. 168, K. of P.
98 N.E. 141 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1912)