Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Huddleston
98 N.E. 382, 50 Ind. App. 698, 1912 Ind. App. LEXIS 78
This text of 98 N.E. 382 (Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Huddleston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Huddleston, 98 N.E. 382, 50 Ind. App. 698, 1912 Ind. App. LEXIS 78 (Ind. Ct. App. 1912).
Opinion
— In this case, the pleadings, the evidence and the assignment of errors are the same, and the instructions given and [699]*699refused are substantially the same, as this court considered in the ease of Baltimore, etc., R. Co. v. Reed (1912), ante, 220, 98 N. E. 141.
On the authority of that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Trustees of Tunnelton Lodge No. 168, K. of P.
98 N.E. 141 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
98 N.E. 382, 50 Ind. App. 698, 1912 Ind. App. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-ohio-southwestern-railroad-v-huddleston-indctapp-1912.