Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company, in Error v. United States
This text of 216 U.S. 617 (Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company, in Error v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
216 U.S. 617
30 S.Ct. 576
54 L.Ed. 639
BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
UNITED STATES.
Nos. 124, 125.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 14, 1910
Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error.
Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio.
Rehearing granted and cases restored to the docket for reargument and assigned to be heard on the first Tuesday of the next term (October 11) after the cases already assigned for that day.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 U.S. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-ohio-southwestern-railroad-company-in-error-v-united-states-scotus-1910.