Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern R. v. Carroll
280 U.S. 537, 50 S. Ct. 16
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 14, 1929
DocketNov 87
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 280 U.S. 537 (Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern R. v. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern R. v. Carroll, 280 U.S. 537, 50 S. Ct. 16 (1929).
Opinion
The petition for a. writ of certiorari, herein to the Supreme Court of Indiana is granted with the. limitation, however, that counsel shall confine themselves, in the briefs and in oral argument, to the question whether this suit is barred by the statute of limitations.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Carroll
171 N.E. 923 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
280 U.S. 537, 50 S. Ct. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-ohio-southwestern-r-v-carroll-scotus-1929.