Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
This text of 160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67 (Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Prom a consideration of all the evidence offered on behalf of the application, together with the facts that no evidence was offered in opposition to the application, and that no municipality or community which would be affected by a discontinuance of passenger train service made any protest or entered an appearance, this court is of the opinion that the order of the commission is unwarranted, unreasonable and unlawful.
The order of the commission is reversed.
Order reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-ohio-rd-co-v-public-utilities-commission-ohio-1953.