Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 17, 1953
DocketNo. 33354
StatusPublished

This text of 160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67 (Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67 (Ohio 1953).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Prom a consideration of all the evidence offered on behalf of the application, together with the facts that no evidence was offered in opposition to the application, and that no municipality or community which would be affected by a discontinuance of passenger train service made any protest or entered an appearance, this court is of the opinion that the order of the commission is unwarranted, unreasonable and unlawful.

The order of the commission is reversed.

Order reversed.

Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taft, Matthias, Hart and Stewart, JJ., concur. Zimmerman, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-ohio-rd-co-v-public-utilities-commission-ohio-1953.