Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Coffland
This text of 251 U.S. 545 (Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Coffland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for. want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Louisiana Nav. Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Grays Harbor Co. v. Coats-Fordney Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19. (2) Section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726. Mr. D. A. Hollingsworth for plaintiff in error. Mr. Ernest Sidney McNamee for defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 U.S. 545, 40 S. Ct. 218, 64 L. Ed. 407, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-ohio-railroad-v-coffland-scotus-1920.