Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Branson

Supreme Court

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Branson

242 U.S. 623, 37 S. Ct. 244

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 29, 1917

DocketNo. 631

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 242 U.S. 623 (Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Branson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Branson, 242 U.S. 623, 37 S. Ct. 244 (1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed with costs upon the authority of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439; Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., 239 U. S. 556; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 U. S. 177, 180; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. Winters, ante, 353. Mr. George A. Pearre, Mr. Duncan K. Brent and Mr. A. Taylor Smith for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Albert A. Doub, Mr. F. Brooke Whiting and Mr. George Lewis Eppler for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed with costs upon the authority of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439; Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., 239 U. S. 556; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 U. S. 177, 180; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. Winters, ante, 353. Mr. George A. Pearre, Mr. Duncan K. Brent and Mr. A. Taylor Smith for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Albert A. Doub, Mr. F. Brooke Whiting and Mr. George Lewis Eppler for the defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 U.S. 623, 37 S. Ct. 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-ohio-railroad-v-branson-scotus-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack