Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Branson

Supreme Court

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Branson

242 U.S. 623, 37 S. Ct. 244

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 29, 1917·No. No. 631·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed with costs upon the authority of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439; Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., 239 U. S. 556; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 U. S. 177, 180; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. Winters, ante, 353. Mr. George A. Pearre, Mr. Duncan K. Brent and Mr. A. Taylor Smith for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Albert A. Doub, Mr. F. Brooke Whiting and Mr. George Lewis Eppler for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed with costs upon the authority of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439; Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., 239 U. S. 556; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 U. S. 177, 180; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. Winters, ante, 353. Mr. George A. Pearre, Mr. Duncan K. Brent and Mr. A. Taylor Smith for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Albert A. Doub, Mr. F. Brooke Whiting and Mr. George Lewis Eppler for the defendant in error.

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Branson, 242 U.S. 623, 37 S. Ct. 244 (1917).

Pincite

242 U.S. 623 (Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Branson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related