Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. Bambrey

16 A. 67, 2 Monag. 109, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 823
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 5, 1888
DocketNo. 123
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 16 A. 67 (Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. Bambrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. Bambrey, 16 A. 67, 2 Monag. 109, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 823 (Pa. 1888).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

None of the assignments of error can be sustained. The rulings of the learned judge of the court below, and his instructions to the jury, cannot be impeached.

The judgment is' affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrill v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
115 N.W. 395 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)
Rhodes v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.
16 Haw. 319 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1904)
Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. Wilson
66 N.E. 950 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1903)
Robb v. Railway Co.
14 Pa. Super. 282 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)
Hot Springs Railroad v. Deloney
45 S.W. 351 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1898)
Northern Pac. R. v. Pauson
70 F. 585 (Ninth Circuit, 1895)
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Rather
3 Tex. Civ. App. 72 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1893)
G.C. S.F. Ry. v. Rather
21 S.W. 951 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1893)
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Martino
18 S.W. 1066 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1893)
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wright
21 S.W. 399 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1893)
Willson v. Northern Pacific Railroad
32 P. 468 (Washington Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 A. 67, 2 Monag. 109, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-ohio-r-r-v-bambrey-pa-1888.