Baltimore & Ohio Express Co. v. Cooper

66 Miss. 558
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only point made by the appellant deserving special mention [560] is that the claim for the loss or damage was not presented in writing at the office which issued the receipt, etc., in accordance with a condition contained in it; and our view is that this condition is not applicable to this case, because the claim here sued on is for damages for negligence by that office in not sending forward the article named, and there was no necessity to bring to the notice of the company at that office the claim for what that office was fully cognizant of, its negligence having caused the loss.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baltimore & Ohio Express Co. v. Cooper, 66 Miss. 558 (Mich. 1889).

66 Miss. 558 (Baltimore & Ohio Express Co. v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Peters
73 So. 151 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1916)
Covington v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad
71 So. 821 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)
Houtz v. Union Pac. R.
93 P. 439 (Utah Supreme Court, 1908)
Nelson v. Great Northern Railway Co.
72 P. 642 (Montana Supreme Court, 1903)