Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad v. Illinois Brick Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad v. Illinois Brick Co.

198 Ill. App. 327, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 419

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 15, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,282

StatusPublished

This text of 198 Ill. App. 327 (Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad v. Illinois Brick Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad v. Illinois Brick Co., 198 Ill. App. 327, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 419 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Carriers, § 218*—when evidence insufficient to establish unjust discrimination in freight rates. In an action by one carrier against another to recover unpaid freight charges for hauling cars on plaintiff’s railroad, defense of unjust discrimination in freight rates charged defendant held not to be established by the evidence. 2. Interest, § 82*—when objection to allowance of interest may not be raised on appeal. Objection to the allowance of interest on plaintiff’s claim not having been presented to the trial court, the question cannot be raised in a court of review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Carriers, § 218*—when evidence insufficient to establish unjust discrimination in freight rates. In an action by one carrier against another to recover unpaid freight charges for hauling cars on plaintiff’s railroad, defense of unjust discrimination in freight rates charged defendant held not to be established by the evidence. 2. Interest, § 82*—when objection to allowance of interest may not be raised on appeal. Objection to the allowance of interest on plaintiff’s claim not having been presented to the trial court, the question cannot be raised in a court of review.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 Ill. App. 327, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-ohio-chicago-terminal-railroad-v-illinois-brick-co-illappct-1916.